Previous
Next
Fixed font
Subject: Re: This mailbox exceeded the maximum number of corrupted items specified for this move mailbox operation
Author: Pete Long Date: 10 Aug 2011
References:
Author: Pete Long Date: 10 Aug 2011
References:
Here's some more information that might be helpful,
<a href="http://www.petenetlive.com/KB/Article/0000489.htm"> This mailbox exceeded the maximum number of corrupted items that were specified for this move request</a>
Pete
<a href="http://www.petenetlive.com">PeteNetLive</a>
__________________________________________________________
<a href="http://www.petenetlive.com/KB/Article/0000489.htm"> This mailbox exceeded the maximum number of corrupted items that were specified for this move request</a>
Pete
<a href="http://www.petenetlive.com">PeteNetLive</a>
__________________________________________________________
> On Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:15 PM Andy David {MVP} wrote:
> Whatever you do, dont run eseutil with the /p option.
> That is destructive.
> What do you have set in the move mailbox wizard for the maximum number
> of corrupt items?
> That is destructive.
> What do you have set in the move mailbox wizard for the maximum number
> of corrupt items?
>> On Sunday, February 10, 2008 7:35 PM Rich Matheisen [MVP] wrote:
>> Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com> wrote:
>>
>> [ snip ]
>>
>>
>> Well, it sure /can/ be destructive. It isn't always so, though.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rich Matheisen
>> MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
>> MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Don't send mail to this address mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
>> Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
>>
>> [ snip ]
>>
>>
>> Well, it sure /can/ be destructive. It isn't always so, though.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rich Matheisen
>> MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
>> MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>> Don't send mail to this address mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
>> Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
>>> On Sunday, February 10, 2008 7:41 PM Andy David {MVP} wrote:
>>> That's probably not a chance anyone should be taking however.
>>> Compared to eseutil/g, I will lean towards using the word "destructive"
>>> every time with /p :P
>>> Compared to eseutil/g, I will lean towards using the word "destructive"
>>> every time with /p :P
>>>> On Sunday, February 10, 2008 8:50 PM Rich Matheisen [MVP] wrote:
>>>> Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Running it on a clean database (one that can be backed up) won't hurt
>>>> anything.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, sure -- one is a "read-only" operation, the other isn't.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Rich Matheisen
>>>> MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
>>>> MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>>> Don't send mail to this address mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
>>>> Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Running it on a clean database (one that can be backed up) won't hurt
>>>> anything.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, sure -- one is a "read-only" operation, the other isn't.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Rich Matheisen
>>>> MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
>>>> MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>>> Don't send mail to this address mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
>>>> Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
>>>>> On Monday, February 11, 2008 9:23 AM Andy David {MVP} wrote:
>>>>> Or help anything...
>>>>>> On Monday, February 11, 2008 10:12 PM Rich Matheisen [MVP] wrote:
>>>>>> Andy David {MVP} <adavid@pleasekeepinngcheesebucket.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> True, dat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But I've used the repair function on a couple of occasions where a
>>>>>> database was marked as "dirty" and the the operation didn't result in
>>>>>> any modifications -- except to make the file mountable. IIRC, it was
>>>>>> after a missing log file made the file inconsistent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't remember the name of the value in the "eseutil /mh" to check,
>>>>>> but there's one that will tell you if the "/p" operation actually
>>>>>> modified the database page(s).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Rich Matheisen
>>>>>> MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
>>>>>> MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>>>>> Don't send mail to this address mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
>>>>>> Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> True, dat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But I've used the repair function on a couple of occasions where a
>>>>>> database was marked as "dirty" and the the operation didn't result in
>>>>>> any modifications -- except to make the file mountable. IIRC, it was
>>>>>> after a missing log file made the file inconsistent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't remember the name of the value in the "eseutil /mh" to check,
>>>>>> but there's one that will tell you if the "/p" operation actually
>>>>>> modified the database page(s).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Rich Matheisen
>>>>>> MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
>>>>>> MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>>>>>> Don't send mail to this address mailto:h.pott@getronics.com
>>>>>> Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@pinkroccade.com mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@getronics.com mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@pinkroccade.com
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, February 12, 2008 8:49 PM riglesau wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm trying to move some users between two of my Exchange 2003, and
>>>>>>> every time that i want to do it i had the same error "This mailbox
>>>>>>> exceeded the maximum number of corrupted items specified for this move
>>>>>>> mailbox operation", I also ran an ESEUTIL /P <database_name>, and all
>>>>>>> its ok. Could you give a hand with this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll really appreciate your comments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cordially,
>>>>>>> Oscar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm trying to move some users between two of my Exchange 2003, and
>>>>>>> every time that i want to do it i had the same error "This mailbox
>>>>>>> exceeded the maximum number of corrupted items specified for this move
>>>>>>> mailbox operation", I also ran an ESEUTIL /P <database_name>, and all
>>>>>>> its ok. Could you give a hand with this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll really appreciate your comments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cordially,
>>>>>>> Oscar.
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:52 AM Pete Long wrote:
>>>>>>>> Here's some more information that might be helpful,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <a href="http://www.petenetlive.com/KB/Article/0000489.htm"> This mailbox exceeded the maximum number of corrupted items that were specified for this move request</a>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pete
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <a href="http://www.petenetlive.com">PeteNetLive</a>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <a href="http://www.petenetlive.com/KB/Article/0000489.htm"> This mailbox exceeded the maximum number of corrupted items that were specified for this move request</a>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pete
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <a href="http://www.petenetlive.com">PeteNetLive</a>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________
Previous
Next